Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

heres a dyno graph all readings are on the same dyno (different days though) and they are on the same graph to read easier.

they are all rb26 engines with rebuild bottom ends (except the highflowed turbos engine which is dead stock). they are all stock capacity and the t04z engine and gt42 engine have different cams to stock.

there is a...

GT42 with 1.0 housing

garret T04Z 0.84 housing

r34 ball bearing low mounts

r32 highflowed stock turbos

here ya go...

108_0841.jpg

cheers

Brad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99705-turbo-comparisions-on-rb26s/
Share on other sites

If all of the turbo's were tuned to max power then psi is irrelevant, one may make less power with more boost.

Diff ratio's here are irrelevant as its all done to RPM..

The poor bloke with the GT42.. Much too big for the 2.6ltr.

Excellent comparision.

Edited by Cubes

Fair enough, I missed the point that they were all rebuilt and tuned to max power.

Only saying that - some engines/boost may not be tuned as high due to different compression ratios, based on HG thickness or engine comp ...

But this is probably the best comparo possible. But i would still like to know boost pressures run across the board, if at all possible

the gt42 was lowish boost, i think around 20psi from memory, the t04z is on 18psi, and the r34 bb turbos i dont know, and the highflows are 18psi.

the t04z graph is simon (r32 GTS) on this forum on low boost (made 620hp i think recently on 23psi)

or by this you can see that twin hks t04z with 0.63 a/r rear housings are almost as responsive as a gt42 with 1.06 a/r.

added a garret t04z with.8 a/r as well for comparison

32gtr_581.jpg

IMG_9652_edited.jpg

32gtr_627.jpg

gt42 is running only 20psi

t04z are about 24psi

twin t04z's are about 28psi

Edited by Cerbera

Funny how some shops will claim more power from one ECU to another.

All ECUs will make the same power if the timing,fuel,turbos,intake etc are the same.

Note that its also the only graph not in full shootout mode.

The history of the 581hp car makes it a poor example as its had a few GCG turbos and GT42 cartrage in GCG housings and many engine builds plus 3 different ECUs and a best of low 12s at the drags, tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 10.7.

Still looks like the TO4Z is the best street strip turbo at the moment.

LOL fastest GTR pass in WA @ 11.7

are you on crack

ND4SPD 10.7

Simons GTR 10.8

Got Boost (gts4 with rb26) 10.9

not even close to the lofty 11.7 you speak of

f**k even bobbos dead stock GTR did 11.8 .. stock turbos internals cams, mines rom, boost zorst and it hoses many a aftermarket ecu equipped GTR time..

Yeah the 581 rwhp is such a crap example.. had massive money thrown at it, blown up on a dyno (oh the memories) , its not like the dog box, autronics etc etc meant that the owner built the car to the best of standards...

/rant over

Brad well done for the post

Edited by [teejay]
Funny how some shops will claim more power from one ECU to another.

All ECUs will make the same power if the timing,fuel,turbos,intake etc are the same.

Note that its also the only graph not in full shootout mode.

The history of the 581hp car makes it a poor example as its had a few GCG turbos and GT42 cartrage in GCG housings and many engine builds plus 3 different ECUs and a best of low 12s at the drags, tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 11.7.

Still looks like the TO4Z is the best street strip turbo at the moment.

also i do believe 2 GTR's and one GTS-4 have done 10's in WA

Edited by Cerbera
tho the Wolf that it was lending has done the fastest GTR pass in WA to date at 10.7.

Actually, the fastest pass by a gt-r in wa is Kier wilson, 9.something in his drag gt-r, and his street car backed it up with a low 10, and they both run motec..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...